黑料网

Current Learning & Teaching Enhancement Programme

In this section
Current Learning & Teaching Enhancement Programme

黑料网 the Learning & Teaching Enhancement Programme 

Colleagues were invited to apply for Learning & Teaching Enhancement Programme (LTEP) funding. The 黑料网’s LTEP was established to encourage the introduction of enhancement activities in learning and teaching and to disseminate effective practice throughout the Institution and beyond. It offers small amounts of funding for academic and professional services staff to support teaching, learning, and assessment research, or dissemination of pedagogical projects.  

黑料网 this year’s Learning & Teaching Enhancement Programme - No longer accepting applications.

This year's LTEP invited applications that aligned with the current Scottish Tertiary Enhancement Programme theme, . Projects focused on initiatives that support this theme, including those related to the indicative list of ongoing activities outlined below: 

  • Curriculum transformation 
  • GenAI and assessment – using and preventing 
  • Assessment redesign including GenAI 
  • Effective feedback 
  • Inclusion including neurodivergence and wellbeing 
  • Transnational education  
  • Student engagement - within all modes of delivery  

Projects could involve, for example, conducting a piece of individual or collaborative research, creating an online/in-person teaching resource or implementing an idea for an online/in-person event to share practice. Collaborative initiatives could be interdisciplinary and should align with the University’s 2040 Strategy.  

2026/27 Funded Projects

Co-designing GenAI resilient assessments for sociology and criminology: preparing students for AI-mediated work

Dr Sonja Erikainen and Dr Paul Bermingham

School of Social Science

AI is transforming how we learn and teach as well as how workplaces are organised and the skills that are needed in employment. In the AI era, conventional assessments no longer adequately capture students’ individual capabilities, giving rise to a pressing need to rethink how we assess. This includes ensuring that assessments remain pedagogically meaningful and develop the capabilities students will need in an increasingly AI-mediated world of work, including critical, creative, and socially and ethically aware AI literacy and competency. This project will enable staff and students in sociology and criminology to co-design assessment approaches that are fit for the AI era and use assessment as means to develop students’ critical AI skills for future employment. The key aims are to understand what AI competencies sociology and criminology students need for future employment, and to build new assessment approaches that are AI resilient while actively developing employability-enhancing attributes. Exploratory qualitative interviews with sociology and criminology students and key staff working in employability will be conducted by a student intern who will explore students’ AI skill and competency needs, supported by a scoping literature review on existing evidence on AI competency and graduate employability. Secondly, a participatory co-design workshop involving sociology and criminology students and staff will be used to collaboratively co-design and prototype alternative assessment methods that enhance AI capabilities while being ‘authentic’ in the sense of reflecting the future of AI-mediated workplaces. This will provide a framework for moving beyond simply preventing students from using AI towards more future-oriented questions around how assessments help students learn to critically engage with AI to prepare them for future professional life. 

One-Size Does Not Fit All: Investigating Statistics Support Approaches for Undergraduates vs Postgraduates and On-Campus vs Online Cohorts

Dr Jacqui Hutchison, Dr Zeshu Shao, Dr Sandie Cleland - School of Psychology

Dr Morgiane Richard - Centre for Academic Development

This project aims to better understand the support preferences of students in maths and stats support which will help us ensure the support offered continues to be relevant to students’ needs and preferences. Importantly the support from LTEP will allow us to employ a student intern which supports the student voice across the project ensuring we not only ask the right questions but incorporate the student voice in the interpretation of our findings. During our project we will examine a range of student cohorts (e.g., on campus undergraduate, on campus postgraduate, online postgraduate, international, learning differences). Findings will be used to inform the support offered in maths and stats but we anticipate the findings will also be useful to other forms of support offered across the institution.

Understanding Neurodivergent Students’ Experiences Across Higher Education Learning Environments

Dr Zeshu Shao, Professor Jason Bohan, Dr Margaret C. Jackson - School of Psychology

Dr Shannon Babbie - School of Education

This project aims to explore neurodivergent students’ experiences of different learning and teaching settings in higher education, including lectures, small-group teaching, group work and practical sessions. It will examine both positive and challenging aspects of these settings, with particular attention to factors that may affect students’ participation, engagement, learning and overall experience. The project will also explore what teaching practices, learning environments and forms of support students perceive as helpful. Data will be collected through an online survey and follow-up interviews, providing both a broader overview of students’ experiences and more detailed accounts of individual perspectives. The findings will be used to identify common barriers and supportive practices across different learning settings, as well as areas where teaching and learning environments could be made more inclusive and accessible. 

Thinking Boundaries: Delegating Cognition to Map Moral GenAI Use in Assessment Across Disciplines and Stakeholders

Dr Peidong Mei and Dr Heather Branigan - School of Psychology

Dr Mingjun Zhong - School of Natural & Computing Science

Dr Claudio Lombardi - School of Law

By gathering initial empirical evidence on how GenAI-related cognitive boundaries are understood in practice across disciplines and stakeholder groups, this project will: 1) Identify areas of convergence and divergence between staff and student expectations across disciplines, particularly where differences may contribute to inconsistent or unclear practice;  2) generate initial cognitive-based pedagogical principles for assessment (re)design and marking criteria that make legitimate AI use more explicit, specifically which cognitive aspects of assessment should remain student-generated across disciplines; 3) complement existing task-based guidance to provide an additional layer of support to adapt their guidance as assessment practices and GenAI capabilities continue to evolve.

AI and Assessment: What Students Need for Fair and Meaningful Learning

Dr Sara Preston - Centre for Academic Development

Professor John Barrow - School of Medicine, Medical Sciences & Nutrition

Members of the Educational Technologies Advisory Group (ETAG)

The growing use of artificial intelligence is prompting universities to reconsider how assessment can remain fair, transparent and focused on meaningful learning. While AI could act as a catalyst for more equitable and student-centred approaches, students may face uncertainty about assessment expectations, permitted AI use and how AI might be used by staff.

Using a mixed methods approach (surveys, focus groups/interviews) the project aims to explore students’ experiences of assessment, their understanding of the revised 3-tier framework (AI level 0, 1 and 2) for communicating the permitted use of AI in assessment, their use of AI in assessment, and their views on how staff might use AI across the assessment and feedback lifecycle.

The findings will inform evidence-based recommendations for clearer assessment communication and the equitable, transparent and responsible use of AI to support meaningful learning.

Understanding students’ approach to finding, navigating and using online careers information

Tracey Innes and Andrew Mackie

Careers and Employability Service

This funded LTEP research project seeks to develop our understanding of students’ approach to finding, navigating and using online careers information, with a particular focus on job search.  The project will utilise a survey and a live observation exercise to ask questions about how and where students look for careers information to understand the barriers to finding careers information and to consider opportunities to enhance the careers information provided by the Careers Team.